Seven steps toward more transparency in statistical practice
01 Sep , 2021·,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Alexandra Sarafoglou
Sil Aarts
Casper Albers
Johannes Algermissen
Štěpán Bahník
Noah Van Dongen
Rink Hoekstra
David Moreau
Don Van Ravenzwaaij
Aljaž Sluga
Franziska Stanke
Jorge N. Tendeiro
Balazs Aczel

Abstract
We argue that statistical practice in the social and behavioural sciences benefits from transparency, a fair acknowledgement of uncertainty and openness to alternative interpretations. Here, to promote such a practice, we recommend seven concrete statistical procedures: (1) visualizing data; (2) quantifying inferential uncertainty; (3) assessing data preprocessing choices; (4) reporting multiple models; (5) involving multiple analysts; (6) interpreting results modestly; and (7) sharing data and code. We discuss their benefits and limitations, and provide guidelines for adoption. Each of the seven procedures finds inspiration in Merton’s ethos of science as reflected in the norms of communalism, universalism, disinterestedness and organized scepticism. We believe that these ethical considerations—as well as their statistical consequences—establish common ground among data analysts, despite continuing disagreements about the foundations of statistical inference.
Type
Publication
Nature Human Behaviour, 5